Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

or

Commission File Number 000-31311

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(408) 280-7900

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,  a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicated by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

There were 32,442,624 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of August 1, 2019.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation 

The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or the full fiscal year. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Use of Estimates 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these financial statements include revenue recognition, impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets, accounting for stock-based compensation expense, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification of Prior Period Amount

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation of reporting amortization of costs capitalized to obtain revenue contracts on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. This reclassification had no effect on the Company’s reported net loss or net cash provided by operating activities.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20 and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, Topic 842). Topic 842 aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize leases with a term greater than 12 months as a right-of-use asset (“ROU”) and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet, regardless of lease classification, and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The lease liability should be initially measured at the present value of the remaining contractual lease payments. Subsequently, the ROU assets will be amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and the lease liability will bear interest expense and be reduced for lease payments. Topic 842 became effective for public companies’ financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective application is required with an option to not restate comparative periods in the period of adoption. The Company adopted Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach, and financial information for the comparative period was not updated.

In addition, the Company elected the transition package of three practical expedients which allow companies not to reassess (i) whether agreements contain leases, (ii) the classification of leases, and (iii) the capitalization of initial direct costs. Further, the Company elected to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases. The Company also made an accounting policy election to recognize lease expense for leases with a term of 12 months or less on a straight-line basis over the lease term and recognize no right of use asset or lease liability for those leases.

The Company’s lease portfolio consists primarily of real estate assets, which include administrative and sales offices, and its research and development laboratory and clean room. Some of these leases also require the Company to pay maintenance, utilities, taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses associated with the leased space. Based upon the nature of the items leased and the structure of the leases, the Company’s leases are classified as operating leases and continue to be classified as operating leases under the new accounting standard.

As a result of the adoption of the new lease accounting guidance, the Company recognized on January 1, 2019:

The adoption of the new lease accounting standard did not have any other impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet, and did not impact the Company’s operating results and cash flows. See Leases, in Note 5 for further information, including further discussion on the impact of adoption and changes in accounting policies relating to leases.

Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Loss)

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effect from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) enacted in December 2017. This update became effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019, and it did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

Compensation - Stock Compensation

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions resulting from expanding the scope of Topic 718, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees and making guidance consistent with the accounting for employee share-based compensation. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019, and it did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

Management has reviewed other recently issued accounting pronouncements and has determined there are not any that would have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13) and also issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instrument, and ASU 2019-05, Financial Instrument – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief (collectively, Topic 326). Topic 326 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on external information, or a combination of both relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and other financial assets that represent a right to receive cash. Topic 326 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the impact of this standard on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This standard eliminates step 2 from the annual goodwill impairment test. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a prospective basis. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The new guidance clarifies the accounting for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software in cloud computing arrangements. Further, the standard also requires entities to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement over the term of the hosting arrangement. This standard is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is permitted. ASU No. 2018-15 should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company has not yet determined the impact of this standard on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

 2. BUSINESS COMBINATION

On April 29, 2019 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired certain assets from StreamMosaic, Inc., a privately held provider of artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions, including the Stream.AI software product line and related assets. Pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement, the Company acquired certain assets, including all intellectual property, from StreamMosaic and certain related liabilities for the purpose of enhancing the Company’s position in advanced data analytics for semiconductors and electronics by broadening its product offering and expanding its customer reach. In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid a total consideration of approximately $2.7 million using cash on hand.

The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be recognized at their fair values as of the Acquisition Date. The excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recorded from this acquisition represents business benefits the Company anticipates from assembled workforce and expectation for expanded sales opportunities in advanced data analytics for semiconductors and electronics. The amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $370,000. Pro-forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to our financial results.

Intangible assets consist of developed technology and customer relationships. The value assigned to intangibles are based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for success and life cycle of intangibles acquired. The following table summarizes the allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the related useful lives, where applicable:

3. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The Company derives revenue from two sources: Solutions revenue and Gainshare performance incentives.

Revenue is recognized when control of products or services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those promised products or services.

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following five steps:

The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of licenses, products and services, some of which are distinct and are accounted for as separate performance obligations. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation, generally on a relative basis using its standalone selling price. The Company does not adjust transaction price for the effects of a significant financing component when the period between the transfers of the promised good or service to the customer and payment for that good or service by the customer is expected to be one year or less. The Company assessed each of its revenue generating arrangements in order to determine whether a significant financing component exists, and determined its contracts did not include a significant financing component for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Nature of Products and Services

Solutions revenue – The Company recognizes revenue for each element of solutions revenue as follows:

The Company licenses majority of its software products separately from project-based solution implementation service contracts, in particular, its Exensio big data platform and related products.  The majority of this software is delivered as on-premise software licenses, while others can be delivered entirely or partially through Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) or cloud delivery models. Revenue from perpetual (one-time charge) license software is recognized at a point in time at the inception of the arrangement when control transfers to the client, if the software license is distinct from the services offered by the Company. Revenue from post-contract support subscription is recognized over the contract term on a straight-line basis, because the Company is providing a service of standing ready to provide support, when-and-if needed, and is providing unspecified software upgrades on a when-and-if available basis over the contract term. Revenue from time-based license software is allocated to each performance obligation and is recognized either at a point in time or over time. The license component is recognized at a point in time, at the delivery of the software license, with the post-contract support subscription component being recognized ratably over for the committed term of the contract. Revenue from software hosting or SaaS arrangements that allow for the use of a hosted software product or service over a contractually determined period of time without taking possession of software is accounted for as subscriptions and recognized as revenue ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the coverage period beginning on the date the service is made available to customers.

The Company also licenses the Design-for-Inspection (“DFI”) system as a separate component of fixed-price service contracts that are not project-based solutions implementation services contracts. The Company allocates revenue to all deliverables under these DFI contracts based on their standalone selling prices, or SSP. In such instances, the Company applies judgment to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation.

The Company generates a portion of its solutions revenue from fixed-price, project-based solution implementation service contracts that are associated with its classic yield ramp business, which services are delivered over a specific period of time. Revenue under these project–based contracts for solution implementation services is recognized as services are performed, using a percentage of completion method based on costs or labor-hours inputs, depending on whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of costs or hours at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs. Losses on fixed-price solution implementation contracts are recognized in the period when they become probable. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become known and can be estimated (the cumulative catch-up method).

The Company typically includes some of its products and other technology as components of its fixed-price, project-based services contracts. In such instances, the Company determines whether the services performed and products/technology included, are distinct. In most cases, the arrangement is a single performance obligation and therefore follows the pattern of transfer as the service is provided. The Company applies a measure of progress (typically hours-to-hours or cost-to-cost) to any fixed consideration. As a result, revenue is generally recognized over the period the services are performed using percentage of completion method. This results in revenue recognition that corresponds with the value to the client for the services transferred to date relative to the remaining services promised.

Gainshare Performance Incentives — When the Company enters into a project-based solution implementation services contract, the contract usually includes two components: (1) a fixed fee for performance by the Company of services delivered over a specific period of time; and (2) a Gainshare performance incentive component where the customer pays a variable fee, usually after the fixed fee period has ended, related to continued usage of the Company's intellectual property.  Revenue derived from Gainshare performance incentives is contingent upon the Company’s customers reaching certain defined production yield levels. Gainshare performance incentive periods are usually subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. The Company records Gainshare revenue as a usage-based royalty based on customers' usage of intellectual property and records in the same period in which the usage occurs. 

Disaggregation of revenue

The Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers into geographical regions, major contract performance obligations and timing of transfer of goods and services. The Company determined that disaggregating revenue into these categories achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

The following table shows the revenues from contracts with customers by the nature of transactions (in thousands):

Licenses and Gainshare Performance Incentives revenue is comprised of (i) the software license fees for perpetual and time-based software license contracts where the standalone selling prices are estimable by the Company, or distinct and separate performance obligations; and (ii) the variable fee component of the Company’s yield improvement service contracts, or Gainshare Performance Incentives, which is usually recognized as revenue subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. The services component of such contracts, including recurring fees for unspecified software updates and technical support, is presented as support and services.

The Company’s performance obligations are satisfied either over time or at a point-in-time. The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue by timing of revenue:

International revenues accounted for approximately 58% and 56% of our total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, compared to 58% and 59% of our total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. See Note 11. Customer and Geographic Information.

Significant Judgments

Judgments and estimates are required under ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Due to the complexity of certain contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under Topic 606 for the Company’s arrangements may be dependent on contract-specific terms and may vary in some instances.

In services arrangements, the Company typically satisfies the performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time. In Design-to-silicon-yield service arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time either because the client controls the asset as it is created (e.g., when the asset is built at the customer site) or because the Company’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use and the Company has an enforceable right to payment plus a reasonable profit for performance completed to date. In most other services arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time because the client simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the Company performs the services.

For revenue under project-based contracts for fixed-price solution implementation services, revenue is recognized as services are performed using a percentage-of-completion method based on costs or labor-hours input method, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of percentage of completion method is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs, and such revisions are reflected in revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known.

The Company’s contracts with customers often include promises to transfer products, licenses and services, including professional services, technical support services, and rights to unspecified updates to a customer. Determining whether products, licenses and services are distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately, or not distinct and thus accounted for together, requires significant judgment. The Company rarely licenses or sells products on a standalone basis, so the Company is required to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation. In instances where SSP is not directly observable because the Company does not sell the license, product or service separately, the Company determines the SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs. The Company, in some cases, has more than one SSP for individual performance obligations. In these instances, the Company may use information such as the size of the customer and geographic region of the customer in determining the SSP.

The Company is required to record Gainshare royalty revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because the Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports from its customers during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in quarterly results for such quarter, the Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of customer's underlying sales achievement. The Company’s estimation process can be based on historical data, trends, seasonality, changes in the contract rate, knowledge of the changes in the industry and changes in the customer’s manufacturing environment learned through discussions with customers and sales personnel. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustments will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

Contract Balances  

The Company performs its obligations under a contract with a customer by transferring products or services in exchange for consideration from the customer. The timing of the Company’s performance often differs from the timing of the customer’s payment, which results in the recognition of a receivable, a contract asset or a contract liability.

The Company classifies the right to consideration in exchange for products or services transferred to a client as either a receivable or a contract asset. A receivable is a right to consideration that is unconditional as compared to a contract asset which is a right to consideration that is conditional upon factors other than the passage of time. The majority of the Company’s contract assets represent unbilled amounts related to fixed-price solution implementation service contracts when the costs or labor-hours input method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the client, and the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance. The contract assets are generally classified as current and are recorded on a net basis with deferred revenue (i.e., contract liabilities) at the contract level. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, contract assets of $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The change in the contract assets balance during the period relates to the recording of revenues for which the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance and movement of previously recorded contract assets to receivables as the right to consideration becomes unconditional.

Contract liabilities primarily consist of deferred revenues and billings in excess of recognized revenues. Deferred revenues consist substantially of amounts invoiced in advance of revenue recognition and is recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. Deferred revenues that will be recognized during the succeeding twelve-month period are recorded as current deferred revenues, and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current deferred revenues. This balance was recorded in the other non-current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The non-current portion of deferred revenue included in other non-current liabilities was $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Billings in excess of recognized revenues included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are attributable to billings in excess of costs under the percentage of completion method representing the difference between contractually invoiced amounts (billings) and revenue recognized based on costs incurred to total estimated total costs at end of period. Billings in excess of recognized revenues are expected to be realized during the succeeding twelve-month period. Revenue recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, that was included in the deferred revenues and billings in excess of recognized revenues balances at the beginning of each reporting period was $4.7 million and $5.0 million, respectively.  Revenue recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, that was included in the deferred revenues and billings in excess of recognized revenues balances at the beginning of each reporting period was $8.7 million and $7.6 million, respectively.

At June 30, 2019, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations related to customer contracts that were unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied was approximately $37.4 million. Given the applicable contract terms, the majority of this amount is expected to be recognized as revenue over the next two years, with the remainder in the following five years.  This amount does not include contracts to which the customer is not committed, nor contracts with original expected lengths of one year or less, nor contracts for which we recognize revenue equal to the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, or future sales-based or usage-based royalty payments in exchange for a license of intellectual property.  This amount is subject to change due to future revaluations of variable consideration, terminations, other contract modifications, or currency adjustments.  The estimated timing of the recognition remaining unsatisfied performance obligations is subject to change and is affected by changes to the scope, change in timing of delivery of products and services, or contract modifications.

Payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30 to 90 days. In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. The primary purpose of invoicing terms is to provide customers with simplified and predictable ways of purchasing the Company’s products and services, and not to facilitate financing arrangements.

The adjustment to revenue recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 from performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods was an increase of $0.3 million and a decrease of $0.2 million, respectively. The adjustment to revenue recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 from performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods was a decrease of $0.2 million and an increase of $0.3 million, respectively. These amounts primarily represent changes in estimated percentage-of-completion based contracts and changes in estimated Gainshare performance incentives for those customers that reported actual Gainshare revenue with some time lag. 

Costs to obtain or fulfill a contract

The Company capitalizes the incremental costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer, including direct sales commissions and related fees, when it expects to recover those costs. As a result, these costs will need to be capitalized and amortized over an appropriate period, which may exceed the initial contract term. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained. The Company uses the portfolio method to recognize the amortization expense related to these capitalized costs related to initial contracts and renewals and such expense is recognized over the period associated with the revenue of the related portfolio. Total capitalized direct sales commission costs as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Amortization of these assets during each of the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $0.1 million. Amortization of these assets during each of the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $0.2 million. There was no impairment loss in relation to the costs capitalized for the periods presented. Certain eligible initial project costs are capitalized when the costs relate directly to the contract, the costs generate or enhance resources of the Company that will be used in satisfying the performance obligation in the future, and the costs are expected to be recovered.

These costs primarily consist of transition and set-up costs related to the installation of systems and processes and other deferred fulfillment costs eligible for capitalization.  Capitalized costs are amortized consistent with the transfer to the client of the services to which the asset relates and recorded as a component of cost of revenues. The Company also incurred certain direct costs to provide solution implementation services in relation to the specific anticipated contracts. The Company recognizes such costs as a component of cost of revenues, the timing of which is dependent upon identification of a contract arrangement. The Company also defers costs from arrangements that required us to defer the revenues, typically due to the pattern of transfer of the performance obligations in the contract. These costs are recognized in proportion to the related revenue. At the end of the reporting period, the Company evaluates its deferred costs for their probable recoverability. The Company recognizes impairment of deferred costs when it is determined that the costs no longer have future benefits and are no longer recoverable. Deferred costs balance was $1.0 million and $0.2 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The balance was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

4. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Accounts receivable

Account receivable includes amounts that are unbilled at the end of the period that are expected to be billed and collected within 12-month period. Unbilled accounts receivable, included in accounts receivable, totaled $13.4 million and $22.2 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable that are not expected to be billed and collected during the succeeding 12-month period are recorded in other non-current assets and totaled $5.6 million and $5.3 million as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment, net consists of (in thousands):

Test equipment includes DFI assets at customer sites that are contributing to DFI solution revenues. The construction-in-progress balance as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was primarily related to construction of DFI assets. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.3 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively.  

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the carrying amounts of goodwill were $2.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

Intangible assets balance was $6.9 million and $5.1 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Intangible assets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consist of the following (in thousands):

The weighted average amortization period for acquired identifiable intangible assets was 6.6 years as of June 30, 2019. For both the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, intangible asset amortization expense was $0.3 million. For both the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, total intangible asset amortization expense was $0.5 million. The Company expects annual amortization of acquired identifiable intangible assets to be as follows (in thousands):

Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, there were no indicators of impairment related to the Company’s intangible assets.

5. LEASES

The Company leases administrative and sales offices and certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases, which contain various renewal options and, in some cases, require payment of common area costs, taxes and utilities. These operating leases expire at various times through 2028. The Company had no leases that were classified as a financing lease as of June 30, 2019.

Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, and the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Long-term operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Effective January 1, 2019, operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. In determining the present value of lease payments, implicit rate must be used when readily determinable. As the Company’s leases do not provide implicit rates, at the date of the Company’s adoption of the new lease standard, the discount rate is calculated using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate determined based on the information available. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives or tenant improvement allowance. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Operating lease expense was $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Operating lease expense was $1.1 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  Operating lease cost includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial.

Maturity of operating lease liabilities as of June 30, 2019, are as follows (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term under operating ROU leases was 7.6 years.

As of June 30, 2019, the weighted average discount rate for operating lease liabilities was approximately 5.3%.

No new operating lease ROU asset was obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.

6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock Repurchase Program 

On October 25, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted a program that was effective immediately to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions over the next two years. On May 29, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated that 2016 stock repurchase program, and adopted a new program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time, over the next two years.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 300,000 shares and 614,000 shares, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, approximately 614,000 shares had been repurchased at an average price of $12.54 per share, for a total price of $7.7 million under the 2018 program. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company repurchased approximately 99,000 and 437,000 shares, respectively, under the 2016 program. As of June 30, 2018, 1,279,189 shares had been repurchased at an average price of $14.59 per share under the 2016 program, for a total purchase of $18.7 million. Under the 2018 program, as of June 30, 2019, $17.3 million of the Company’s common stock remained available for future repurchases.

7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

On June 30, 2019, the Company had the following stock-based compensation plans:

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In July 2001, the Company adopted a ten-year Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended, the “Purchase Plan”) under which eligible employees can contribute up to 10% of their compensation, as defined in the Purchase Plan, towards the purchase of shares of PDF common stock at a price of 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of the purchase period. The Purchase Plan consists of twenty-four-month offering periods with four six-month purchase periods in each offering period. Under the Purchase Plan, on January 1 of each year, starting with 2002, the number of shares reserved for issuance will automatically increase by the lesser of (1) 675,000 shares, (2) 2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding year, or (3) the number of shares determined by the board of directors. At the annual meeting of stockholders on May 18, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan to extend it through May 17, 2020.

The Company estimated the fair value of purchase rights granted under the Purchase Plan during the period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, resulting in the following weighted average fair values:

During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, no shares were issued under the Purchase Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, a total of approximately 87,000 and 108,000 shares, respectively, were issued at a weighted-average purchase price of $8.93 and $9.29 per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, there was $1.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Purchase Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. As of June 30, 2019, 5.2 million shares were available for future issuance under the Purchase Plan.   

Stock Incentive Plans

On November 16, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which has been amended and restated a number of times (as amended, the “2011 Plan”). Under the 2011 Plan, the Company may award stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants or stock units covering shares of the Company’s common stock to employees, directors, non-employee directors and contractors. The aggregate number of shares reserved for awards under this plan is 10,300,000 shares, plus up to 3,500,000 shares previously issued under the 2001 Plan that are forfeited or repurchased by the Company or shares subject to awards previously issued under the 2001 Plan that expire or that terminate without having been exercised or settled in full on or after November 16, 2011. In case of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights, the aggregate number of shares reserved under the plan will be decreased at a rate of 1.33 shares issued pursuant to such awards. The exercise price for stock options must generally be at prices no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Stock options generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four-year period.

In 2001, the Company adopted a 2001 Stock Plan (the “2001 Plan”). In 2003, in connection with its acquisition of IDS Systems Inc., the Company assumed IDS’ 2001 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan (the “IDS Plan”). Both of the 2001 and the IDS Plans expired in 2011. Stock options granted under the 2001 and IDS Plans generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four -year period. Although no new awards may be granted under the 2001 or IDS Plans, awards made under the 2001 and IDS Plans that are currently outstanding remain subject to the terms of each such plan.

As of June 30, 2019, 10.8 million shares of common stock were reserved to cover stock-based awards under the 2011 Plan, of which 4.4 million shares were available for future grant. The number of shares reserved and available under the 2011 Plan includes 0.5 million shares that were subject to awards previously made under the 2001 Plan and were forfeited, expired or repurchased by the Company after adoption of the 2011 Plan through June 30, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, there were no outstanding awards that had been granted outside of the 2011, 2001 or the IDS Plans (collectively, the “Stock Plans”).

The Company estimated the fair value of share-based awards granted under the 2011 Stock Plan during the period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, resulting in the following weighted average fair values:

No stock options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Stock-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, generally four years. Stock-based compensation expense before taxes related to the Company’s stock plans and employee stock purchase plan was allocated as follows (in thousands): 

The stock-based compensation expense in the table above includes immaterial expense or credit adjustments related to cash-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted to certain employees. The Company accounted for these awards as liability awards and the amount was included in accrued compensation and related benefits. Stock-based compensation capitalized in the capitalized software development costs included in the Property and Equipment, net, was approximately $0.2 million at June 30, 2019.

Additional information with respect to options under the Stock Plans during the six months ended June 30, 2019, was as follows:

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $13.12 per share as of June 30, 2019. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2019, was $1.0 million.

As of June 30, 2019, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2019, was $0.1 million.

Nonvested restricted stock units activity during the six months ended June 30, 2019, was as follows:

As of June 30, 2019, there was $13.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years. Restricted stock units do not have rights to dividends prior to vesting.

8. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

On September 27, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a reduction in its workforce to reduce expenses and align its operations with evolving business needs. Notifications to the affected employees began on October 24, 2018.

From inception of the restructuring plan to June 30, 2019, the Company has recorded restructuring charges of $0.7 million, primarily consisting of employee separation charges. The Company is in the process of implementing the restructuring plan, and the remaining charges expected to be incurred are not expected to be significant.

The following table summarizes the activities of restructuring liabilities under this plan (in thousands): 

9. INCOME TAXES  

Income tax benefit increased $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, to a $0.9 million income tax benefit as compared to an income tax benefit of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The Company’s effective tax rate benefit was 22% and 25% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate benefit decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, primarily due to favorable reductions in excess tax benefits related to employee stock compensation and changes in the level of profitability and forecasted income.

The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, as of June 30, 2019, was $13.5 million, of which $7.9 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, as of December 31, 2018, was $13.3 million, of which $7.8 million, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate. As of June 30, 2019, the Company has recorded unrecognized tax benefits of $3.0 million, including interest and penalties of $0.7 million, as long-term taxes payable in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. The remaining $11.3 million has been recorded net of our deferred tax assets, of which $5.6 million is subject to a full valuation allowance. 

The valuation allowance was approximately $10.2 million and $9.8 million as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively, which was related to California R&D tax credits and California net operating losses related to the Company’s acquisition of Syntricity. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets because it believes that it is more likely than not that these tax attributes will not be realized.

Effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act creates a new requirement to include in U.S. income global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”). The GILTI must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company is allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). During the first quarter of 2018, the Company selected the period cost method in recording the tax effects of GILTI in its condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and foreign jurisdictions. Because the Company used some of the tax attributes carried forward from previous years to tax years that are still open, statutes of limitation remain open for all tax years to the extent of the attributes carried forward into tax year 2002 for federal and California tax purposes. The Company is not subject to income tax examinations in any of its major foreign subsidiaries’ jurisdictions.

10. NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options and shares subject to repurchase). Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands except per share amount): 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company was in a loss position, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share as the inclusion of the potential common shares would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods indicated (in thousands):  

11. CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker, the chief executive officer, reviews discrete financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of regularly making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, the Company considers itself to be in one operating segment, specifically the licensing and implementation of yield improvement solutions for companies designing and/or manufacturing integrated circuits. 

The Company had revenues from individual customers in excess of 10% of total revenues as follows: 

The Company had gross accounts receivable from individual customers in excess of 10% of gross accounts receivable as follows: 

Revenues from customers by geographic area based on the location of the customers’ work sites are as follows (in thousands):

Long-lived assets, net by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):

12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The multiple assumptions used to value financial instruments are referred to as inputs, and a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is established, that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions. These inputs are ranked according to a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2019, and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018, and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts from time to time to reduce the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, primarily on third-party accounts payables and intercompany balances. The primary objective of the Company’s hedging program is to reduce volatility of earnings related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The counterparty to these foreign currency forward contracts is a large global financial institution that the Company believes is creditworthy, and therefore, the Company believes the credit risk of counterparty nonperformance is not significant. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment.

Therefore, the change in fair value of these contracts is recorded into earnings as a component of other income (expense), net, and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, which is also recorded in other income (expense), net. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized a realized loss of $22,000 and a realized loss of $551,000 on the contracts, respectively, which was recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized a realized loss of $292,000 and a realized loss of $365,000 on the contracts, respectively, which was recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

The Company carries these derivatives financial instruments on its condensed consolidated balance sheets at their fair values. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are classified as Level 2 because they are not actively traded and the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had no outstanding forward contract. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had one outstanding forward contract with a notional amount of $8.2 million and recorded $55,000 other current liability associated with the outstanding forward contract.  

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Indemnifications — The Company generally provides a warranty to its customers that its software will perform substantially in accordance with documented specifications typically for a period of 90 days following initial delivery of its products. The Company also indemnifies certain customers from third-party claims of intellectual property infringement relating to the use of its products. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant. The Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on its future results of operations.

 Purchase obligations — The Company has purchase obligations with certain suppliers for the purchase of goods and services entered in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2019, total outstanding purchase obligations were $11.0 million, which are primarily due within the next 12 months.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors  — As permitted by the Delaware general corporation law, the Company has included a provision in its certificate of incorporation to eliminate the personal liability of its officers and directors for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their fiduciary duties as officers or directors, other than in cases of fraud or other willful misconduct.

In addition, the Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company is required to indemnify its officers and directors even when indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and the Company is required to advance expenses to its officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors containing provisions that are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware general corporation law. The indemnification agreements require the Company to indemnify its officers and directors against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers and directors other than for liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature, to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance if available on reasonable terms. The Company has obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance in amounts comparable to other companies of the Company’s size and in the Company’s industry. Since a maximum obligation of the Company is not explicitly stated in the Company’s Bylaws or in its indemnification agreements and will depend on the facts and circumstances that arise out of any future claims, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.

Litigation — From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with FASB requirements. As of June 30, 2019, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings, thus no loss was probable and no amount was accrued.